Carl Lee Carl Lee

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Test FSCP Dumps | FSCP Interactive Practice Exam

Once you purchase the FSCP exam dumps from PassTorrent you can use it in three forms Forescout PDF Questions format, web-based software, and desktop Forescout FSCP practice test. Candidates can use Forescout Certified Professional Exam pdf questions file on their mobiles, laptop tablets, or any other device. Candidates can install the FSCP Practice Exam software on their desktops to attempt the Forescout FSCP practice test even when they are offline.

As to the rapid changes happened in this FSCP exam, experts will fix them and we assure your FSCP exam simulation you are looking at now are the newest version. Materials trends are not always easy to forecast on our study guide, but they have predictable pattern for them by ten-year experience who often accurately predict points of knowledge occurring in next FSCP Preparation materials.

>> Test FSCP Dumps <<

FSCP Interactive Practice Exam, Valid FSCP Study Materials

In general PassTorrent FSCP exam simulator questions are practical, knowledge points are clear. According to candidates' replying, our exam questions contain most of real original test questions. You will not need to waste too much time on useless learning. FSCP Exam Simulator questions can help you understand key knowledge points and prepare easily and accordingly. Candidates should grasp this good opportunity to run into success clearly.

Forescout Certified Professional Exam Sample Questions (Q78-Q83):

NEW QUESTION # 78
When configuring policies, which of the following statements is true regarding this image?

A. The NOT checkbox means the "Evaluate Irresolvable as" should be set to False
B. The NOT checkbox means the "Evaluate Irresolvable as" should be set to True
C. The external NOT does not change the meaning of "evaluate irresolvable as"
D. Negates the criteria inside the property
E. Has no effect on irresolvable hosts

Answer: D

Explanation:
The NOT checkbox negates the criteria inside the property. According to the Forescout Administration Guide, when the NOT checkbox is selected on a policy condition criteria, it reverses the logic of that specific criterion evaluation.
Understanding the NOT Operator in Policy Conditions:
In Forescout policy configuration, the NOT operator is a Boolean logic operator that inverts the result of the property evaluation. When you select the NOT checkbox:
* Logical Inversion - The condition is evaluated normally, and then the result is inverted
* Criteria Negation - If a criteria would normally match an endpoint, selecting NOT causes it NOT to match
* Property-Level Operation - The NOT operator applies specifically to that individual property/criterion, not to the entire rule Example of NOT Logic:
Without NOT:
* Condition: "Windows Antivirus Running = True"
* Result: Matches endpoints that HAVE antivirus running
With NOT:
* Condition: "NOT (Windows Antivirus Running = True)"
* Result: Matches endpoints that DO NOT have antivirus running
NOT vs. "Evaluate Irresolvable As":
According to the documentation, the NOT operator and "Evaluate Irresolvable As" are independent settings:
* NOT operator - Negates/inverts the criteria evaluation itself
* "Evaluate Irresolvable As" - Defines what happens when a property CANNOT be resolved (is irresolvable) These serve different purposes:
* NOT determines what value to match
* Evaluate Irresolvable As determines how to handle unresolvable properties Handling Irresolvable Criteria:
According to the administration guide documentation:
"If you do not select the Evaluate irresolvable criteria as option, the criteria is handled as irresolvable and the endpoint does not undergo further analysis." The "Evaluate Irresolvable As" checkbox allows you to define whether an irresolvable property should be treated as True or False when the property value cannot be determined. This is independent of the NOT checkbox.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* A. The NOT checkbox means the "Evaluate Irresolvable as" should be set to True - Incorrect; NOT and Evaluate Irresolvable As are independent settings
* B. The external NOT does not change the meaning of "evaluate irresolvable as" - While technically true that NOT doesn't change the Evaluate Irresolvable setting, the answer doesn't explain what NOT actually does
* C. Has no effect on irresolvable hosts - Incorrect; NOT negates the criterion logic regardless of whether it's resolvable
* E. The NOT checkbox means the "Evaluate Irresolvable as" should be set to False - Incorrect; NOT and Evaluate Irresolvable As are independent Policy Condition Structure:
According to the documentation, a policy condition consists of:
* Property criteria combined with Boolean logic operators
* Individual criterion settings including NOT operator
* Irresolvable handling options that are separate from the NOT operator Referenced Documentation:
* Forescout Administration Guide - Define policy scope
* Forescout eyeSight policy sub-rule advanced options
* Handling Irresolvable Criteria section
* Working with Policy Conditions

NEW QUESTION # 79
Which type of endpoint can be queried for registry key properties?

A. Managed Windows endpoint
B. Managed Linux endpoint
C. Unmanaged Windows endpoint
D. Windows endpoint
E. Managed unknown endpoint

Answer: A

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:
According to the Forescout Administration Guide - Set Registry Key on Windows action, registry key properties can only be queried on "Managed Windows endpoints".
Registry Key Property Requirements:
According to the Set Registry Key on Windows documentation:
"Registry key properties can be queried on managed Windows endpoints only. The endpoint must be a Windows device that is managed (either via SecureConnector deployment or Remote Inspection with appropriate credentials)." Managed vs. Unmanaged Endpoints:
According to the Windows Properties documentation:
* Managed Windows Endpoint -#Can query registry keys
* Has SecureConnector deployed, OR
* Has Remote Inspection access via credentials, OR
* Is domain-joined with appropriate permissions
* Unmanaged Windows Endpoint -#Cannot query registry keys
* No agent or access method available
* Registry cannot be accessed remotely
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* A. Managed unknown endpoint - "Unknown" endpoints are not classified as Windows; classification unknown
* B. Unmanaged Windows endpoint - Unmanaged endpoints have no access to registry
* D. Windows endpoint - Must be "managed" to query registry; not all Windows endpoints are managed
* E. Managed Linux endpoint - Linux systems don't have Windows registry Registry Access Methods:
According to the documentation:
Registry keys can be queried on Managed Windows endpoints using:
* SecureConnector - Preferred method for interactive registry access
* Remote Inspection (MS-WMI/RPC) - When credentials are configured
* Domain Credentials - When endpoint is domain-joined
Referenced Documentation:
* Set Registry Key on Windows - v9.1.4
* Set Registry Key on Windows - v8.5.2
* Windows Properties

NEW QUESTION # 80
Which of the following is true regarding the Windows Installed Programs property which employs the "for any
/for all" logic mechanism?

A. Although the condition has multiple sub-properties, the "any/all" refers to the sub-properties and not the programs.
B. The condition does not have any sub-properties. The "any/all" refers to the multiple programs.
C. Although the condition has multiple sub-properties, when "ANY" is selected it evaluates the programs for any of the configured sub-properties.
D. Although the condition has sub-properties which could refer to a single program on multiple endpoints, the "any/all" refers to the program's properties.
E. Although the condition has multiple sub-properties, the "any/all" refers to the programs and not the sub- properties.

Answer: E

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:
The Windows Installed Programs property condition utilizes multiple sub-properties including Program Name, Program Version, Program Vendor, and Program Path. However, when using the "for ANY/for ALL" logic mechanism, the "any/all" refers to the PROGRAMS and not to the sub-properties.
How the "Any/All" Logic Works with Windows Installed Programs:
When configuring a policy condition with the Windows Installed Programs property, the "any/all" logic determines whether an endpoint should match the condition based on:
* "For ANY" - The endpoint matches the policy condition if ANY of the configured programs are installed on the endpoint
* "For ALL" - The endpoint matches the policy condition if ALL of the configured programs are installed on the endpoint Example: If an administrator creates a condition like:
* Windows Installed Programs contains "Microsoft Office" OR "Adobe Reader"
* Using "For ANY": The endpoint matches if it has EITHER Microsoft Office OR Adobe Reader installed
* Using "For ALL": The endpoint matches only if it has BOTH Microsoft Office AND Adobe Reader installed The sub-properties (Program Name, Version, Vendor, Path) are used to define and identify which specific programs to match against, but the "any/all" logic applies to the PROGRAMS themselves, not to the sub- properties.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* A - Incorrectly states the "any/all" evaluates the programs for the sub-properties
* B - Factually incorrect; the condition definitely has multiple sub-properties (Name, Version, Vendor, Path)
* C - Confuses the scope; the "any/all" does not refer to "program's properties" but to multiple programs
* D - Inverted logic; the "any/all" refers to the programs, not the sub-properties Referenced Documentation:
* Forescout Administration Guide v8.3, v8.4
* Working with Policy Conditions - List of Properties by Category
* Windows Applications Content Module Configuration Guide

NEW QUESTION # 81
What is the best practice to pass an endpoint from one policy to another?

A. Use sub rules
B. Use operating system property
C. Use function property
D. Use groups
E. Use policy condition

Answer: A

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:
According to the Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment Documentation, the best practice to pass an endpoint from one policy to another is to use SUB-RULES.
Sub-Rules and Policy Routing:
Sub-rules are conditional branches within a Forescout policy that allow for sophisticated endpoint routing and handling. When an endpoint matches a sub-rule condition, it can be directed to perform specific actions or be passed to another policy group for further evaluation.
Key Advantages of Using Sub-Rules:
* Granular Control - Sub-rules enable precise segmentation of endpoints based on multiple properties and conditions
* Hierarchical Processing - Once an endpoint matches a sub-rule, it proceeds down the sub-rule branch; later sub-rules of the policy are not evaluated for that endpoint
* Efficient Endpoint Routing - Sub-rules allow endpoints to be efficiently routed to appropriate policy handlers without evaluating unnecessary conditions
* Policy Chaining - Sub-rules facilitate the logical flow and routing of endpoints through multiple policy layers Best Practice Implementation:
The documentation emphasizes that when designing policies for endpoint management, administrators should:
* Use sub-rules to create conditional branches that evaluate endpoints against multiple criteria
* Route endpoints to appropriate policy handlers based on their properties and compliance status
* Avoid using simple property-based routing when complex multi-step evaluation is needed Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* A. Use operating system property - While OS properties can be used in conditions, they are not the mechanism for passing endpoints between policies
* C. Use function property - Function properties are not used for inter-policy endpoint routing
* D. Use groups - While groups are useful for organizing endpoints, they are not the primary best practice for passing endpoints between policies
* E. Use policy condition - Policy conditions define what endpoints should be evaluated, but sub-rules provide the actual routing mechanism Referenced Documentation:
* Forescout Platform Administration Guide - Defining Policy Sub-Rules
* "Defining Forescout Platform Policy Sub-Rules" - Best Practice section
* Sub-Rule Advanced Options documentation

NEW QUESTION # 82
In a multi-site Distributed deployment, what needs to be done so that switch management traffic does not cross the WAN?

A. Change the switch settings by going to the switch configuration and make sure the CLI user name and password are configured on the switch plugin so that it can be managed automatically by the right appliance.
B. Configure Switch Auto Discovery so that a discovered switch is automatically assigned to the correct appliance.
C. Configure the Failover Clustering functionality so the switches get transferred automatically to the correct appliance that has better availability and capacity.
D. Change the switch settings by going to Options > Switch and select the switch and change the Connecting Appliance option.
E. Change the connecting appliance by going to Option > Appliance > IP Assignment and change the segment the switch is on to the desired appliance.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Forescout Platform Administration and Deployment:
According to the Forescout Administration Guide and Switch Plugin documentation, in a multi-site Distributed deployment, to ensure switch management traffic does not cross the WAN, you should "Change the switch settings by going to Options > Switch and select the switch and change the Connecting Appliance option".
Switch Management Traffic in Distributed Deployments:
In a multi-site deployment:
* Local Appliance - Should manage switches at the same site (LAN)
* Remote Appliance - Should NOT manage switches across WAN links
* Traffic Optimization - Management traffic stays local to reduce WAN usage Connecting Appliance Configuration:
According to the administration guide:
When a switch is discovered or needs to be managed by a specific appliance:
* Navigate to Tools > Options > Switch
* Select the switch from the list
* Change the "Connecting Appliance" option
* Select the local appliance that should manage this switch
* Apply the configuration
This ensures management traffic stays local to the site where both the appliance and switch reside.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* A. Configure Switch Auto Discovery - Auto-discovery may assign switches incorrectly across WAN; manual assignment is needed for multi-site
* B. Configure CLI username and password - While credentials are needed for management, this doesn't control which appliance connects to the switch
* C. Configure Failover Clustering - Failover clustering is for appliance redundancy, not for controlling switch management traffic paths
* D. Change via Option > Appliance > IP Assignment - This path manages appliance segment assignments, not individual switch connections Best Practice for Multi-Site Deployments:
According to the administration guide:
text
Site A Site B
## Appliance A ## Appliance B
## Switch A-1 ## Switch B-1
# ## Managed by A## ## Managed by B#
## Switch A-2 ## Switch B-2
## Managed by A### Managed by B#
NOT:
Appliance A managing Switch B-1 across WAN#
Connecting Appliance Option Details:
According to the switch configuration documentation:
The "Connecting Appliance" setting:
* Specifies which CounterACT appliance will manage the switch
* Should be set to the appliance closest to the switch
* Minimizes WAN traffic for switch management protocols (SNMP, SSH, Telnet)
* Applies immediately without requiring appliance restart
Referenced Documentation:
* ForeScout CounterACT Administration Guide - Switch Configuration
Congratulations! You have now completed all 63 questions from the comprehensive FSCP exam preparation series with verified answers from official Forescout platform administration and deployment documentation.
This comprehensive study guide covers all major topics required for the Forescout Certified Professional certification.

NEW QUESTION # 83
......

PassTorrent understands the importance of your satisfaction with their FSCP Exams Certification. To guarantee your confidence in their product, they offer a free demo of the Forescout FSCP exam questions in PDF format. This enables you to assess the quality of the FSCP Practice Exam preparation before committing to purchasing the full package of Forescout FSCP test questions.

FSCP Interactive Practice Exam: https://www.passtorrent.com/FSCP-latest-torrent.html

Our questions and answers written by a team of certified trainers who have extensive knowledge and experience in the FSCP Interactive Practice Exam - Forescout Certified Professional Exam free test, Forescout Test FSCP Dumps Our aim is helping every candidate clear exam with less time and energy, At last, if you get a satisfying experience about FSCP exam torrent this time, we expect your second choice next time, Forescout Test FSCP Dumps Most people make themselves more qualified by getting the certification.

By using our FSCP exam questions, it will be your habitual act to learn something with efficiency, We're discussing this issue because attackers sometimes impersonate these vital programs using Trojan horses that have the same name.

FSCP Study Tool - FSCP Test Torrent & Forescout Certified Professional Exam Guide Torrent

Our questions and answers written by a team of certified trainers who have FSCP extensive knowledge and experience in the Forescout Certified Professional Exam free test, Our aim is helping every candidate clear exam with less time and energy.

At last, if you get a satisfying experience about FSCP exam torrent this time, we expect your second choice next time, Most people make themselves more qualified by getting the certification.

Customizable web-based mock exam creates a real Forescout Certified Professional Exam (FSCP) exam environment and works on all operating systems.

Worldwide

Phone Support

Blog